- WBPaper00038168:lin-35_downregulated
For each gene in each microarray hybridization experiment, the ratio of RNA levels from the two samples was transformed into a log2 value and the mean log2 ratio was calculated. The log2 ratios were normalized by print-tip Loess normalization (Dudoit and Yang, 2002). All genes with a false discovery rate of <= 5% (q <= 0.05) (Storey and Tibshirani, 2003) and a mean fold-change ratio of >= 1.5 were selected for further analysis.
Genes that were downregulated in lin-35.
- WBPaper00038168:lin-35_upregulated
For each gene in each microarray hybridization experiment, the ratio of RNA levels from the two samples was transformed into a log2 value and the mean log2 ratio was calculated. The log2 ratios were normalized by print-tip Loess normalization (Dudoit and Yang, 2002). All genes with a false discovery rate of <= 5% (q <= 0.05) (Storey and Tibshirani, 2003) and a mean fold-change ratio of >= 1.5 were selected for further analysis.
Genes that were upregulated in lin-35.
- WBPaper00038168:lin-15B(n744)_downregulated
For each gene in each microarray hybridization experiment, the ratio of RNA levels from the two samples was transformed into a log2 value and the mean log2 ratio was calculated. The log2 ratios were normalized by print-tip Loess normalization (Dudoit and Yang, 2002). All genes with a false discovery rate of <= 5% (q <= 0.05) (Storey and Tibshirani, 2003) and a mean fold-change ratio of >= 1.5 were selected for further analysis.
Genes that were downregulated in lin-15B(n744).
- WBPaper00038168:lin-15B(n744)_upregulated
For each gene in each microarray hybridization experiment, the ratio of RNA levels from the two samples was transformed into a log2 value and the mean log2 ratio was calculated. The log2 ratios were normalized by print-tip Loess normalization (Dudoit and Yang, 2002). All genes with a false discovery rate of <= 5% (q <= 0.05) (Storey and Tibshirani, 2003) and a mean fold-change ratio of >= 1.5 were selected for further analysis.
Genes that were upregulated in lin-15B(n744).
- WBPaper00032022:X-Ray_upregulated
Gene was considered induced if the difference in expression levels was significant (p < 0.05) compared to the control. To be considered the change in expression had to be at least 2 fold compared to the control.
Genes induced at least 2 fold 2 hours after 120Gy X-ray treatment
- WBPaper00034739:TreatmentAffectedGenes
The normalised data were analysed using a two-way ANOVA, testing for each gene the effects of LINE (N2, DR1350, RIL-14, RIL-17), TREATMENT (non-dauer vs dauer larva-inducing) and the LINE TREATMENT interaction, using a published PERL script.
Genes with expression significantly affected by TREATMENT (non-dauer vs dauer), or TREATMENT X LINE at p < 0.001.
- WBPaper00054191:H3.3(null)_embryo_downregulated
Differentially expressed genes were estimated using a General Linear Model approach, negative binomial distribution, and a quasi-likelihood F-test. Genes with a P-value < 0.05 and fold change > 1 were considered significant.
Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in H3.3 null mutant animals (FAS43 [his-69&his-70(uge44) III; his-72(tm2066) III; his-74(uge18) V; his-71(ok2289) X]) comparing to in N2 animals at embryo stage.
- WBPaper00054191:H3.3(null)_embryo_upregulated
Differentially expressed genes were estimated using a General Linear Model approach, negative binomial distribution, and a quasi-likelihood F-test. Genes with a P-value < 0.05 and fold change > 1 were considered significant.
Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in H3.3 null mutant animals (FAS43 [his-69&his-70(uge44) III; his-72(tm2066) III; his-74(uge18) V; his-71(ok2289) X]) comparing to in N2 animals at embryo stage.
- WBPaper00054191:H3.3(null)_L1_downregulated
Differentially expressed genes were estimated using a General Linear Model approach, negative binomial distribution, and a quasi-likelihood F-test. Genes with a P-value < 0.05 and fold change > 1 were considered significant.
Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in H3.3 null mutant animals (FAS43 [his-69&his-70(uge44) III; his-72(tm2066) III; his-74(uge18) V; his-71(ok2289) X]) comparing to in N2 animals at L1 larva stage.
- WBPaper00054191:H3.3(null)_L1_upregulated
Differentially expressed genes were estimated using a General Linear Model approach, negative binomial distribution, and a quasi-likelihood F-test. Genes with a P-value < 0.05 and fold change > 1 were considered significant.
Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in H3.3 null mutant animals (FAS43 [his-69&his-70(uge44) III; his-72(tm2066) III; his-74(uge18) V; his-71(ok2289) X]) comparing to in N2 animals at L1 larva stage.