- WBPaper00038168:lin-35_downregulated
For each gene in each microarray hybridization experiment, the ratio of RNA levels from the two samples was transformed into a log2 value and the mean log2 ratio was calculated. The log2 ratios were normalized by print-tip Loess normalization (Dudoit and Yang, 2002). All genes with a false discovery rate of <= 5% (q <= 0.05) (Storey and Tibshirani, 2003) and a mean fold-change ratio of >= 1.5 were selected for further analysis.
Genes that were downregulated in lin-35.
- WBPaper00038168:lin-35_upregulated
For each gene in each microarray hybridization experiment, the ratio of RNA levels from the two samples was transformed into a log2 value and the mean log2 ratio was calculated. The log2 ratios were normalized by print-tip Loess normalization (Dudoit and Yang, 2002). All genes with a false discovery rate of <= 5% (q <= 0.05) (Storey and Tibshirani, 2003) and a mean fold-change ratio of >= 1.5 were selected for further analysis.
Genes that were upregulated in lin-35.
- WBPaper00038168:lin-15B(n744)_downregulated
For each gene in each microarray hybridization experiment, the ratio of RNA levels from the two samples was transformed into a log2 value and the mean log2 ratio was calculated. The log2 ratios were normalized by print-tip Loess normalization (Dudoit and Yang, 2002). All genes with a false discovery rate of <= 5% (q <= 0.05) (Storey and Tibshirani, 2003) and a mean fold-change ratio of >= 1.5 were selected for further analysis.
Genes that were downregulated in lin-15B(n744).
- WBPaper00038168:lin-15B(n744)_upregulated
For each gene in each microarray hybridization experiment, the ratio of RNA levels from the two samples was transformed into a log2 value and the mean log2 ratio was calculated. The log2 ratios were normalized by print-tip Loess normalization (Dudoit and Yang, 2002). All genes with a false discovery rate of <= 5% (q <= 0.05) (Storey and Tibshirani, 2003) and a mean fold-change ratio of >= 1.5 were selected for further analysis.
Genes that were upregulated in lin-15B(n744).
- WBPaper00041906:I-3690_vs_I-4317_OP50_3d
Differential expression was assayed via limma. Genes were considered differentially expressed when the multiple testing adjusted P-value < 0.01.
Differentially expressed genes between C.elegans fed with L.rhamnosus strain CNCM I-3690 and CNCM I-4317 strains and with CNCM I-3690 and control strain E.coli OP50 after 3 days of feeding.
- WBPaper00064850:glh-1(sam65)_downregulated
DESeq2, fold change > 2, FDR < 0.05.
Transcripts that showed significantly decreasedexpression in DUP144[glh-1(sam65[glh-1(deletion)-gfp-3xFlag])] I comparing to in wild type control DUP64[glh-1(sam24[glh-1-gfp-3xFlag])] I.
- WBPaper00064850:glh-1(sam65)_upregulated
DESeq2, fold change > 2, FDR < 0.05.
Transcripts that showed significantly increasedexpression in DUP144[glh-1(sam65[glh-1(deletion)-gfp-3xFlag])] I comparing to in wild type control DUP64[glh-1(sam24[glh-1-gfp-3xFlag])] I.
- WBPaper00041906:I-3690_I-4317_vs_OP50_10d
Differential expression was assayed via limma. Genes were considered differentially expressed when the multiple testing adjusted P-value < 0.01.
Differentially expressed genes between C.elegans fed with L.rhamnosus strain CNCM I-3690 and L.rhamnosus strain CNCM I-4317 after 10 days of feeding.
- WBPaper00041906:I-3690_I-4317_vs_OP50_3d
Differential expression was assayed via limma. Genes were considered differentially expressed when the multiple testing adjusted P-value < 0.01.
Genes differentially expressed between C.elegans fed with L.rhamnosus strain CNCM I-3690 and CNCM I-4317 and not found in C. elegans fed with OP50 control strain after 3 days of feeding.