WBPaper00045263:ProLongevity-mtROS_downregulated

Comparisons of each genotype were compared to the wild-type using the Empirical Base (Wright & Simon) algorithm and fold changes were represented on a log2 scale. A threshold of p < 0.05 and a fold change of 1.3 (log2) was set to determine differentially expressed targets. Transcripts with significantly decreased expression under all of these conditions

WBPaper00045263:ProLongevity-mtROS_upregulated

Comparisons of each genotype were compared to the wild-type using the Empirical Base (Wright & Simon) algorithm and fold changes were represented on a log2 scale. A threshold of p < 0.05 and a fold change of 1.3 (log2) was set to determine differentially expressed targets. Transcripts with significantly increased expression under all of these conditions

WBPaper00045263:0.1mM-paraquat_upregulated

Comparisons of each genotype were compared to the wild-type using the Empirical Base (Wright & Simon) algorithm and fold changes were represented on a log2 scale. A threshold of p < 0.05 and a fold change of 1.3 (log2) was set to determine differentially expressed targets. Transcripts with significantly increased expression after treatment with 0.1mM paraquat vs. control

WBPaper00045263:0.1mM-paraquat_downregulated

Comparisons of each genotype were compared to the wild-type using the Empirical Base (Wright & Simon) algorithm and fold changes were represented on a log2 scale. A threshold of p < 0.05 and a fold change of 1.3 (log2) was set to determine differentially expressed targets. Transcripts with significantly decreased expression after treatment with 0.1mM paraquat vs. control

WBPaper00045263:nuo-6(qm200)_upregulated

Comparisons of each genotype were compared to the wild-type using the Empirical Base (Wright & Simon) algorithm and fold changes were represented on a log2 scale. A threshold of p < 0.05 and a fold change of 1.3 (log2) was set to determine differentially expressed targets. Transcripts with significantly increased expression in nuo-6(qm200) vs. N2, and in nuo-6(qm200);ced-4(n1162) vs. ced-4(n1162).

WBPaper00045263:isp-1(qm150)_downregulated

Comparisons of each genotype were compared to the wild-type using the Empirical Base (Wright & Simon) algorithm and fold changes were represented on a log2 scale. A threshold of p < 0.05 and a fold change of 1.3 (log2) was set to determine differentially expressed targets. Transcripts with significantly decreased expression in isp-1(qm150) vs. N2, and in isp-1(qm150)ced-4(n1162) vs. ced-4(n1162).

WBPaper00045263:isp-1(qm150)_upregulated

Comparisons of each genotype were compared to the wild-type using the Empirical Base (Wright & Simon) algorithm and fold changes were represented on a log2 scale. A threshold of p < 0.05 and a fold change of 1.3 (log2) was set to determine differentially expressed targets. Transcripts with significantly increased expression in isp-1(qm150) vs. N2, and in isp-1(qm150) ced-4(n1162) vs. ced-4(n1162).

WBPaper00045263:nuo-6(qm200)_downregulated

Comparisons of each genotype were compared to the wild-type using the Empirical Base (Wright & Simon) algorithm and fold changes were represented on a log2 scale. A threshold of p < 0.05 and a fold change of 1.3 (log2) was set to determine differentially expressed targets. Transcripts with significantly decreased expression in nuo-6(qm200) vs. N2, and in nuo-6(qm200);ced-4(n1162) vs. ced-4(n1162).

WBPaper00046415:lithium_downregulated

All data were analyzed using Stat View J 5.0, with all experimental data checked for assumptions of homogeneity of variance across manipulations using Bartletts test. Once the assumptions were satisfied, the data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnetts multiple comparison test. When homogeneity was not evident in the data, we used the nonparametric KruskalWallis test, followed by the MannWhitney U-test with a Bonferroni adjustment. Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05. Genes suppressed following 24h exposure to lithium compounds (78uM LiCl and 375uM Li2CO3), according to custom DNA microarray.