27 Expression clusters found (0.011 seconds)

N.A. Proteins interacting with HA-PPM-1.D.

hierarchical clustering Germline-enriched and sex-biased expression profile cluster D.

Differential gene expression analysis was done with DESeq2 R-package using an FDR based on adjusted P < 0.05. (The threshold was reset from FDR < 0.1 to FDR < 0.05 by WormBase curator.) Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in Q neuroblast descendant cells expressing a constitutively active, N terminally truncated form of BAR-1 (beta-catenin) (del-N-BAR-1 Q) (huIs179).

WBPaper00061210:huIs179_downregulated

Differential gene expression analysis was done with DESeq2 R-package using an FDR based on adjusted P < 0.05. (The threshold was reset from FDR < 0.1 to FDR < 0.05 by WormBase curator.) Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in Q neuroblast descendant cells expressing a constitutively active, N terminally truncated form of BAR-1 (beta-catenin) (del-N-BAR-1 Q) (huIs179).

WBPaper00045257:bar-1(ga80)_upregulated

All statistical analyses were performed using the statistical programming language R (version 2.13.1 x 64). A linear model was used to determine the effect and significance of the genotype on the expression levels (probe intensity + genotype + error). Using permutations of the original data in the same linear model, authors determined thresholds adjusted for multiple testing (FDR 0.05: -log10(p) > 2; FDR 0.01: -log10(p) > 3). To correct for the developmental difference between bar-1(ga80) and N2 authors used the developmental gene expression data from Snoek et al. (2014) together with the gene expression data generated for this study (bar-1(ga80) vs. N2) in one linear model (probe intensity, sample age + genotype + error). The intensities were corrected for batch effect and for sample age authors used an age of 44 hours for the bar-1(ga80) samples (as estimated), and 48 hours for the N2 samples. Genes that showed increased expression in bar-1(ga80) animal comparing to in N2.

WBPaper00045257:bar-1(ga80)_downregulated

All statistical analyses were performed using the statistical programming language R (version 2.13.1 x 64). A linear model was used to determine the effect and significance of the genotype on the expression levels (probe intensity + genotype + error). Using permutations of the original data in the same linear model, authors determined thresholds adjusted for multiple testing (FDR 0.05: -log10(p) > 2; FDR 0.01: -log10(p) > 3). To correct for the developmental difference between bar-1(ga80) and N2 authors used the developmental gene expression data from Snoek et al. (2014) together with the gene expression data generated for this study (bar-1(ga80) vs. N2) in one linear model (probe intensity, sample age + genotype + error). The intensities were corrected for batch effect and for sample age authors used an age of 44 hours for the bar-1(ga80) samples (as estimated), and 48 hours for the N2 samples. Genes that showed decreased expression in bar-1(ga80) animal comparing to in N2.

WBPaper00033070:Elbe_downregulated

[ANOVA, p < 0.05 without multiple sample correction, fold-change to reference sediment Danube (D) > 1.4 (up-regulated) or < 0.7 (down-regulated)]. Genes with significantly changing transcripts in C. elegans exposed to the Elbe (E) sediment.

WBPaper00033070:Elbe_upregulated

WBPaper00033070:Rhine_downregulated

WBPaper00033070:Rhine_upregulated

load 10 more results